Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-12-2026
Abstract
While the F region is the primary focus of many ionospheric models because it contains the peak electron density, the E region is an important region for ionospheric conductivities and high-frequency radio propagation. This study analyzes modeled E regions from the newly developed PyIRI and E-PROBED models. A long-term comparison of E region predictions from E-PROBED and PyIRI with ionosonde observations is performed for three sites spanning low- (Fortaleza, Brazil), mid- (El Arenosillo, Spain), and high-latitudes (Gakona, Alaska). Modeled foE and hmE trends are compared against a combination of manually-scaled and automatically-scaled ionograms using ARTIST-5 for the period 2009–2024 for El Arenosillo and Gakona, and 2015–2024 for Fortaleza. Measured and modeled virtual heights are compared for a subset of the ionograms through the use of a numerical ray-tracer. Overall, the models showed reasonable agreement with the ionosonde observations, with solar cycle, seasonal, and diurnal trends well captured for foE. E-PROBED generally overestimates foE with Mean Absolute Relative Errors (MRAEs) peaking around 70 % at dusk, while PyIRI showed close agreement with ionosonde foE resulting in MRAE peaks around 10 %. The hmE predictions showed weaker agreement, with a 15-20 km overestimate from E-PROBED when compared against auto-scaled ionograms, and a constant hmE prediction of 110 km for all times from PyIRI. However, manually-scaled hmE estimates show close agreement with E-PROBED predictions, indicating that great care must be taken when using auto-scaled hmE. Modeled virtual heights derived from E-PROBED and PyIRI show reasonable agreement with ionosonde observations, providing confidence in altitude-integrated electron density profiles. A slight bias exists between the modeled and measured virtual heights, and the direction of the bias reverses for manual- versus auto-scaled ionograms, demonstrating that auto-scaled uncertainties are also present in the virtual height observations. Overall, these results indicate that E-PROBED and PyIRI provide reasonable E region estimates and may be used for practical applications that require modeled E region parameters.
Source Publication
Annales Geophysicae (ISSN 1432-0576)
Recommended Citation
Emmons, D. J., Salinas, C. C. J. H., Wu, D. L., Swarnalingam, N., Dao, E. V., Chau, J. L., Yamazaki, Y., Fitch, K. E., and Forsythe, V. V.: A comparison of modeled daytime E regions from E-PROBED and PyIRI with ionosonde observations, Ann. Geophys., 44, 17–34, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-44-17-2026, 2026.
Comments
© 2026 The Authors.
This article is published by the European Geosciences Union, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Sourced from the published version of record cited below.
Model code and software for this work are available from the article's page at EGU, via the DOI link on this page. Use the "Assets" tab at that location.