Document Type
Article
Publication Date
8-13-2025
Abstract
Over the past decade, studies have been conducted to increase the understanding of associations between the fecal microbiome and human health. In conjunction, researchers have investigated the effects of study design, methods, molecular processing, and sequencing techniques. However, a lack of standardization of fecal sample collection methodology has introduced heterogeneity in sequencing results. Sources of variability include sample collection methods, storage temperatures, and transport times. Here we present 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing results from two sample collection methods (unstabilized sterile swab and stabilized OmniGene Gut Kits) collected from the same fecal specimens. The paired samples were collected either at the research facility or the participants’ home and ground shipped to the research facility at ambient temperature. Therefore, samples were exposed to variable temperatures and transport times. We found that fecal sample collection methods resulted in taxonomic and diversity differences that showed distinct patterns between swab and OmniGene samples. Swab samples were disproportionally affected by increased transport time, but differences in taxa and diversity were driven more by sample collection method, as compared to transport time. Based on previous studies, many of the taxa that were associated with sample collection methods and transport times have clinical relevance. Collectively, this research highlights: 1) the need for further standardization of methods for fecal microbiome studies; 2) limitations of direct comparisons between different fecal sample collection methods; and 3) the importance of careful consideration of sample collection methods for future studies and meta-analyses.
Source Publication
PLOS One (eISSN 1932-6203)
Recommended Citation
Stamper, C. E., Hoisington, A. J., Ellis, J. C., Lowry, C. A., & Brenner, L. A. (2025). Stabilized and unstabilized sampling methods result in differential fecal 16S rRNA microbial sequencing results. PLOS One, 20(8), e0324351. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324351
Comments
The article is published in Plos One under the Creative Commons CC0 Public Domain Declaration.
Please fully attribute the authors in any reuse of this article.
Data for this research is openly available at the DOI link below.