Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-3-2024
Abstract
Surface layer optical turbulence values in the form of the refractive index structure function C_n^2 are often calculated from surface layer temperature, moisture, and wind characteristics and compared to measurements from sonic anemometers, differential temperature sensors, and imaging systems. A key derived component needed in the surface layer turbulence calculations is the sensible heat value. Typically, the sensible heat is calculated using the bulk aerodynamic method that assumes a certain surface roughness and a friction velocity that approximates the turbulence drag on temperature and moisture mixing from the change in the average surface layer vertical wind velocity. These assumptions/approximations generally only apply in free convection conditions. To obtain the sensible heat, a more robust method, which applies when free convection conditions are not occurring, is via an energy balance method such as the Bowen ratio method. The use of the Bowen ratio––the ratio of sensible heat flux to latent heat flux––allows a more direct assessment of the optical turbulence-driving surface layer sensible heat flux than do more traditional assessments of surface layer sensible heat flux. This study compares surface layer C_n^2 values using sensible heat values from the bulk aerodynamic and energy balance methods to quantifications from sonic anemometers posted at different heights on a sensor tower. The research shows that the sensible heat obtained via the Bowen ratio method provides a simpler, more reliable, and more accurate way to calculate surface layer C_n^2 values than what is required to make such calculations from bulk aerodynamic method-obtained sensible heat.
Source Publication
Applied Optics (ISSN 1559-128X|eISSN 2155-3165)
Recommended Citation
Steven Fiorino, Yogendra Raut, Jaclyn Schmidt, Laura Slabaugh, Blaine Fourman, Jack McCrae, Benjamin Wilson, and Santasri Bose-Pillai, "Quantification of surface layer turbulence using sensible heat values from energy balance versus aerodynamic methods," Appl. Opt. 63, E78-E85 (2024). doi: 10.1364/AO.521086
Comments
Copyright © 2024 Optica Publishing Group
The "Download" button on this page opens the accepted manuscript version of this article, furnished from the CHORUS program. AFIT Scholar shares this in accordance with rules found at Open Policy Finder for the source journal, as the repository of the employer of the authors. See also the Optica Publishing Group's licenses page.
Author notes: Yogendra Raut, Jaclyn Schmidt, and Blaine Fourman was co-affiliated with Applied Research Solutions at the time of this article.
An embargo was observed for sharing the manuscript.
The published version of record (VOR) for this article is found in Applied Optics as cited below. The version of record is accessible by subscription or purchase through the DOI link.
Typesetting note: C_n^2 is the best available representation of the equation in the abstract, where the 2 is subscripted directly below the superscripted n.