Flight Tests of Passive Flow Control for Suppression of Cavity Aeroacoustics
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-2021
Abstract
This research focused on furthering the current understanding of the flowfield inside a cavity under typical flight conditions. The flight envelope included altitudes of up to 40,000 ft and maximum Mach number of 1.28 and included several test points between Mach 0.9 and 1.1, which are challenging to isolate in wind tunnel testing due to tunnel wall interference. The pod was instrumented to collect aeroacoustic pressures and qualitative flowfield imaging for a cavity with a length-to-depth ratio of four. Test missions were flown with several different passive flow control configurations, and their respective effect on acoustic properties and flow patterns were collected. Flow control comprising a rod-in-a-crossflow or a traditional sawtooth spoiler was generally found to reduce sound pressure level, though the extent of effectiveness varied with flight condition. The flow control devices installed at or below the cavity exit plane were found to have little influence. Tuft-based flow visualization complemented the effort, for one example, by demonstrating the outward flow near the cavity lip for the sawtooth spoiler.
Source Publication
Journal of Aircraft (ISSN 1533-3868)
Recommended Citation
Prudhomme, Daniel, Daniel Chin, Mark F Reeder, Ryan Schmit, Ian Maatz, and Rudy Johnson. “Flight Tests of Passive Flow Control for Suppression of Cavity Aeroacoustics.” Journal of Aircraft 58, no. 4 (July 2021). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C036001.
Comments
This article is available via subscription or purchase through the DOI link below.
Co-author Daniel Prudhomme was an AFIT graduate student at the time of this publication.
Co-author Daniel Chin was an Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Fellow at the time of this article.