Investigating Regional Communication Network Robustness of an Asymmetric String-of-Pearls Satellite Constellation Design Framework
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-2024
Abstract
Appropriate selection of a satellite constellation design framework for a particular mission set requires a priori knowledge about the relative merits and shortcomings of different frameworks. Symmetric satellite constellation frameworks exhibit good properties for missions requiring continuous global coverage, whereas asymmetric satellite constellation frameworks benefit missions focusing on regional coverage. This research compares the performance of an asymmetric "string-of-pearls" common repeating ground track constellation design framework against a Walker constellation design framework for maintaining continuous connectivity between regions of interest. Several examples illustrate that the asymmetric string-of-pearls constellation framework appears to require an average of approximately 1.25 fewer satellites than the Walker constellation, whereas the Walker constellation appears approximately 7.86% more robust to satellite failures.
Source Publication
Journal of Spacecraft & Rockets
Recommended Citation
Nathaniel M. Choo, Brian J. Lunday, Darryl K. Ahner, Nathan B. Gaw, Bryan D. Little, & Brian K. McBee. (2024). Investigating Regional Communication Network Robustness of an Asymmetric String-of-Pearls Satellite Constellation Design Framework. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 61(3), 798–807. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A35802
Comments
This is a subscription-access article, available to readers with a subscription to Journal of Spacecraft & Rockets, using the DOI link below.
Current AFIT students, faculty, and staff may access the full article by clicking here.