Analytical comparisons of handheld LIBS and XRF devices for rapid quantification of gallium in a plutonium surrogate matrix
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
Winter 3-2022
Abstract
This work compares a portable laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) analyzer to a portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) device for quantification of gallium (Ga) in a plutonium surrogate matrix of cerium (Ce) for the first time. Calibration methods are developed with spectra of Ce–Ga samples from both devices. Metrics such as limit of detection (LoD) and mean average percent error (MAPE) are examined to evaluate calibration performance. While the portable LIBS device can yield a nearly instantaneous analytical measurement, its accuracy is hampered by self-absorption. By employing a self-absorption correction and increasing gating delay, LIBS calibrations with errors in the low single percents and LoDs of 0.1% Ga were constructed. The XRF device produces calibrations with superlative sensitivity, yielding LoDs for gallium in the low tens of parts-per-million (ppm), two orders of magnitude lower than the corrected LIBS models. However, a clear trade-off of measurement fidelity is established between the instantaneous analysis of the LIBS device and the minutes-long XRF measurement yielding superior detection limits.
Source Publication
Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectroscopy
Recommended Citation
Rao, A. P., Jenkins, P. R., Auxier, J. D., Shattan, M. B., & Patnaik, A. K. (2022). Analytical comparisons of handheld LIBS and XRF devices for rapid quantification of gallium in a plutonium surrogate matrix. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 37(5), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1JA00404B
Comments
© The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022.
The full-text of the published version of record for this article is accessible by subscription to Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectroscopy.
The accepted manuscript for the article is now available, in accordance with research funding requirements. Use the "Link to Full Text" on this page.