Date of Award

3-2000

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science

Department

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

First Advisor

Richard A. Raines, PhD

Abstract

In the 60's the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics engaged in a "space race" to be the first to put a man on the moon. Today, the space race is between large multinational telecommunication corporations with the winner receiving the financial rewards by providing communication services to the billions without even a simple telephone. Many entrants are using Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites to provide the communications infrastructure, but the number of customers a satellite can support is limited by bandwidth available. This resource must be used efficiently, and this involves reducing the management overhead. This thesis investigates one aspect of management overhead, the bandwidth cost associated with mobility management. This thesis provides a performance analysis of three different mobility management topologies and their associated protocols when used in a LEO satellite constellation. Simulations were developed to compare two aspects of mobility management protocols. The first aspect was to determine which is the better location for the Visitor Location Register (VLR) and Authentication Center, collocated with the Home Location Register in the terrestrial gateways or placed on the communications satellites. The second aspect compared three methods of updating the VLR, if the VLR is onboard the satellite. Three different update schemes were examined: using the standard IS-4l-C protocol, transferring the database from one satellite to another, or discarding the database and rebuilding it from scratch. The thesis results concluded that simply moving the VLR from the gateway to the satellite did not decrease the traffic overhead associated with mobility management. In fact, the amount of traffic increased about 33 percent. Moving the AC and VLR together to the satellite however decreased the traffic load by average of 10 percent over the standard model.

AFIT Designator

AFIT-GCS-ENG-00M-04

DTIC Accession Number

ADA380913

Comments

The author's Vita page is omitted.

Download

Share

COinS