Date of Award
9-1997
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science
First Advisor
David S. Christensen, PhD
Abstract
In December 1996, the Cost/Schedule Control Systems Criteria (C/SCSC) was officially replaced by the Earned Value Management Systems (EVMS) criteria. The switch to EVMS, coupled with current acquisition reform changes, have left many wondering what the effects of these changes will be. This thesis defines the costs and benefits of the old C/SCSC, and then compares them. Additionally, this thesis discusses the changes accompanying the switch to EVMS and the effect on the costs and benefits. The marginal costs of C/SCSC are defined as the difference between the costs of a C/SCSC compliant system and a contractors normal management control system. The marginal system compliance costs are 334-481 person days, while the marginal operating costs are 50% of the C/SCSC compliant operating costs. Fourteen benefits of C/SCSC are detailed in this thesis. The most important benefit discovered was the data reliability that comes with a criteria compliant management control system. The main difference between C/SCSC and EVMS is the system certification process. Under C/SCSC, DoD teams would have to certify a contractor's system. Under EVMS, contractors have the ability to self-certify their system (with final government approval). Cost savings may result through self-certification without reductions in the benefits.
AFIT Designator
AFIT-GCA-LAS-97S-2
DTIC Accession Number
ADA329813
Recommended Citation
Cole, John R. Jr. and Fussell, Judson M., "A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Earned Value Management System Criteria" (1997). Theses and Dissertations. 5799.
https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/5799
Comments
Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Logistics and Acquisition Management of the Air Force Institute of Technology.
Co-authored thesis.